Posts Tagged ‘US Embassy Thailand’

K1 Visas: The Widows Penalty

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

The following article explains the so-called “Widow’s Penalty.” Legal deficiencies in the US Immigration and Nationality Act place widows and widowers of Americans in a legally difficult position if the American spouse dies before a final ruling in a critical phase of the Immigration process.

US Immigration is a deep area of law because it is an area largely governed by statutory regulations. Certain aspects of American Immigration can be very confusing and one of the most confusing issues deals with two things that few bi-national couples wish to address: Death and Loss of Immigration Benefits.

In cases involving marriage to a United States Citizen, for a foreign fiancee to eventually obtain unconditional permanent residence in the United States they must pass through a series of adjudications for the Immigration authorities to ensure that the marriage is not a sham. There is a valid argument that the US government begins scrutinizing a couple the moment the application for a K1 visa is submitted. Upon preliminary approval, the file will be sent to the US Embassy or Consulate with jurisdiction over the foreign fiancee’s residence. The Consulate will interview the applicant and if satisfied that the marriage is genuine, they will issue a K1 visa. The foreign fiancee will then pass through an inspection point at a port of entry in the United States where Customs and Border Protection officers will make another determination as to admissibility.

After lawful admission in the United States, the non-Citizen fiancee must marry the Citizen fiance and apply for adjustment of status wthin 90 days. In most cases, the marriage is executed and the foreign spouse is approved for adjustment, thereby making her a conditional lawful permanent resident. After two years in conditional permanent resident status, the couple must apply to have the foreign spouse’s residence made unconditional. The so-called “widows penalty” becomes an issue during the pendency of an adjustment of status application or before the submission of an application to lift the conditions of the foreign spouse’s residence. If the American Citizen spouse dies prior to the approval of either of these petitions, then it can create a difficult situation for the foreign spouse because the applicant no longer meets the requirement for a lifting of conditions or adjustment. Thus, the non-Citizen widow could be considered out of status as they are no longer married to a United States Citizen. US Courts have attempted to address this problem by interpreting statutes to allow foreign spouses to remain in the United States. The United States Department of Homeland Security has provided a sort of amnesty for widows by deferring inspection of those in that situation.

These legal issues are not fully settled as currently there are conflicting interpretations of these laws. In general, the mood of the courts seems to be in favor of doing away with this so-called penalty because implementing the law in its current form leads to unfair outcomes for immigrants already present in the USA.

K3 Visa Law: Form G28

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

As of the day of this writing, USCIS is issuing a new G28 (Notice of Attorney Appearance) form. This document is used to signal the presence of an attorney in a case pending before the DHS (Department of Homeland Security).

American Citizens date, court, and often marry people from countries other than the USA. As a result, a large number of Immigration applications are submitted to the DHS (Department of Homeland Security). Oftentimes, the beneficiary and petitioner decide to handle the immigration matter by themselves, in that case the G28 will not need to be presented as there is no attorney involved. A G28 form is used to inform the government that a qualified representative has entered their appearance in a case.

A significant difference between the old and new version of the G28 form is that the new form requires one to indicate in which agency the case is pending. If the situation involves an issue with the CBP (Customs and Border Protection), then the lawyer will tick the box on the G-28 denoting said agency. If the situation involves a client who has been detained by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement), then the for requires that this information be disclosed.

In situations where a G-28 is submitted, it is common for USCIS to send the attorney of record duplicate copies of all correspondence between the Service and the Petitioner. Also, if the US Embassy sends correspondence to the non-citizen beneficiary, then the American attorney will generally be provided with a copy of the relevant correspondence.

As mentioned in previous articles, submission of a G28 form is one way of making certain that one is dealing with an attorney because only an attorney may be paid to appear before the government in immigration matters. Further, the current G28 form requires the attorney to disclose their state of license and bar number. One should not feel embarrassed to ask for a copy of an attorney’s credentials. Any United States Immigration practitioner who is unable to produce some sort of license (state bar license, state Supreme Court license, Federal Court license, etc.) should be viewed with caution.

To learn more please see: k1 visa. Please see k1 visa process for more on getting a visa to the USA.

How Long Can My Thai Fiancee Wait Before She Must Use Her K1 Visa?

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

This post is meant to provide information regarding the many facets of the US Immigration process for Thai Fiancees. All over the world wide web there are websites which claim expertise in US Visas from Thailand. The intention of this piece is to simply provide information and insight.

The K1 visa process is relatively long, and at times, the cause of some consternation. In certain instances, a Thai-American couple will wait between 5-6 months before obtaining approval from USCIS. Upon approval, the application must be sent to the National Visa Center and then finally, in the case of Thai fiancee visa applications, to the file will be sent to the US Embassy in Thailand. For many, this process can be aggravating. In many cases, the wait ultimately results in the issuance of a valid K1 fiancee visa.

After receiving the visa, there are those who are distressed about the information imparted on the actual travel document. Of great concern is the notation on the visa which states: “K-1 Petition Expires on MM DD, YYYY.” Many American Citizens mistakenly believe that this is the end of the visa’s validity. As a practical matter, the visa is valid for going to the USA until its expiration. As a rule, K1 visas are valid for six months. Although, they could be issued with more or less validity as it is technically at the discretion of the Consular Officer adjudicating the case at the United States Embassy in Bangkok.

The expiration date of the visa can cause confusion as well. The K1 visa is valid for six months after issuance. After arriving in the USA and being lawfully admitted thereto, the holder of the K1 visa will be able to remain for 90 days. Subsequent to an approval for adjustment of status, the K1 visa holder will be granted conditional lawful permanent residence. Some people, after being issued the K1 fiance visa, are puzzled by these different dates. The important thing to bear in mind about the K1 visa is that it can be utilized within 6 months of its issuance and it provides 90 days of lawful status to the bearer upon entry. If the parties do not get married in 90 days, then the K1 visa holder must leave the USA before the visa expires.

Hiring an Attorney for a Thai Fiancee: Conducting Due Diligence

Sunday, October 4th, 2009

A major concern for anyone seeking to retain legal advice regarding an Immigration matter from Thailand: how can I tell if my Thai fiancee is receiving legal advice from a competent credible professional? The answer: ask to see some credentials. Much like a waitress asking someone for ID who appears less than 21 years of age, prospective clients should never be too shy to ask their prospective attorney for a copy of his or her bar card or other certificate in order authenticate their credentials. Also, inquire as to what law school the attorney attended, if he or she graduated, and upon graduation what state bar exam was taken and passed in order to acquire a license to practice law. If the person in question evades the inquiry or becomes hostile, then this might be a sign that the person is hiding something…or isn’t what they claim to be. If he or she provides the name of their state of licensure, then go to the internet and search for the bar association or Supreme Court of that state. Every state maintains a database listing all of the attorneys licensed in their jurisdiction. If the “attorney” is not on this list, then further inquiry may be required.

Usually at this phase, most people would wonder: “Am I going to trust my Thai fiance to an operator who fabricates information about their legal credentials?”

United States Immigration rules and regulations are a complex and constantly changing area of American law. On the surface, United States immigration may appear to be a straightforward endeavor and there are those who claim it is merely “filling in forms.” However, upon further investigation, one will quickly see that it is a narrow and deep area of legal practice, filled with pitfalls for the unwary. Failure to be one hundred percent honest in an application can lead to unintended consequences. Pose this question to yourself, “should I place my thai fiancee in the hands of a person who instructs her to lie to the U.S. Government?”

A lack of knowledge with regard to applicable immigration rules, regulations, and deadlines, can place the otherwise innocent couple into a situation where their hopes of obtaining a visa are in jeopardy. When hiring an Immigration Attorney stay away from so-called “visa companies,” and “visa specialists,” as they are unsanctioned by the Immigration authorities at USCIS. The operators to be most on the lookout for often use the even more sinister tactic of claiming to be an actual attorney when in fact they are unlicensed and often have not even graduated from an accredited law school in the US. An unethical operator such as this ought to be dismissed out of hand, because they can cause problems in a case due to lack of expertise and where something does go wrong, even where it is no fault of theirs, they still are unable to remedy the situation because USCIS will not correspond with an unlicensed agent. Generally, Embassies and Consulates will not accept 221g follow up documentation from an unlicensed attorney.

To learn more about this and other Immigration matters please see: K1 Visa Thailand.

US Immigration Thailand: Dual Intent

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

The Dual Intent Doctrine is a legal concept that occasionally arises in United States jurisprudence, specifically Immigration and Nationality law. This idea was formulated in order to grapple with those situations where an alien present in the US on a non-immigrant visa has aspirations for eventual residence. Pursuant to the American Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) a non-immigrant can be denied access to the United States either at the Embassy level (through visa denial) or at the port of entry in the United States should the competent authorities decide that the applicant is actually intending to immigrate. For instance, many applicants for a US tourist visa are turned down based upon section 214b of the INA which creates a statutory presumption of immigrant intent, those presumed to have immigrant intent cannot be granted a non-immigrant visa. The Doctrine of Dual intent creates visas which allow the visa holder to simultaneously have both the intention to remain in the US short term and the intention to remain in the US long term. Examples of visa categories which utilize the dual intent doctrine are the L1 visas and the H1b visas. Both of these employment visas leave legal room for alien to aspire to American Permanent Residence, while also maintaining non-immigrant visa status. In the area of United States Family Immigration, the K1 fiance visa is a classic example of a visa that employs the dual intent doctrine. The bearer of an American fiance visa is permitted to request admission to the USA at a port of entry. At first, the K1 visa holder is in non-immigrant visa status and the visa has a validity of merely 90 days once used. However, the bearer of the visa is allowed to get married to their American fiance and apply for permanent residence via adjustment of status. If applying for most visas, an applicant with dual intent would be denied a visa, or be barred from entering the United States. In certain cases, American Immigration legislation has created special exceptions to general rules in order to deal with extraordinary situations.

Types of US and Thai Visas

Friday, August 14th, 2009

Even though this query sounds as if it has an easy answer, in reality visas are a complicated area for laypeople. Some folks do not realize that until after WWI passports were a rarity, and visas were not often utilized.

The types of visa discussed in this article are not used to purchase consumer goods. Conversely, these are the items necessary to enter many foreign nations. A widely held belief involves the concept that the holder of a visa has an unalienable “right” to enter the foreign nation. In general, a visa does not confer an unalienable right to enter a country.” Instead, a visa is simply an acknowledgment by a diplomatic or consular officer that the person holding the visa should be accorded the right to seek entry.

In Thailand, there are many different visa categories under Thai Immigration law. Thailand seems to have a Permanent Resident system comparable to that of the USA. However, looks can be deceiving as Thai Permanent Residence is extremely difficult to obtain and there is a quota set for people of differing nationalities. In the late 1970’s the Thai government authorities at Royal Thai Immigration promulgated non-immigrant visa categories. At present the most common categories are the B visa (Thailand Business Visa), the Thailand O Visa, and the Thailand Retirement Visa.

A large number of Thai nationals request entry to the USA on a yearly basis. One of the most desired visas by Thai nationals is the K1 fiancee visa. The K1 visa was created for Thai fiancee’s of American Citizens who wish to travel to the USA and marry their loved one.

In some cases, where a couple is already married, it may be necessary to file for a classic United States Immigrant Visa. The CR-1 or IR-1 Visa (Immigrant) give the bearer the right to reside permanently in the USA. In most cases, the Immigrant Visa will take 12 months to process. However, for those couples who are already married and wish to expedite the process the K3 marriage visa is an option. The K3, like the K1, is a non-immigrant visa category. This means that the K3 visa holder will need to adjust their status in the USA. In the past, K3’s were considered important because CR1 and IR1 Immigrant visas took a long time to process. The K3 is slowly being rendered obsolete due to increased efficiency on the part of USCIS.

Countries other than the Kingdom of Thailand and the United States issue visas.

For more information please see Thailand Visa

This isn’t a sufficient alternative to individualized legal counsel. No Attorney/client relationship should be inferred from reading this article.)

US Visa Information: The Adam Walsh Act

Saturday, June 6th, 2009

For many years US Congressmen and Senators have generally taken an unwavering position against those who have committed sex crimes that involved children. Along this line, the Adam Walsh Child Protection Act was introduced in the US Congress. After passage in both Houses, this legislation was signed by President Bush in 2006.

This legislation shares certain similarities with the International Marriage Brokers Regulation Act since it also creates immgration impediments for US Citizen petitioners whose prior conduct is governed by the statute. Pursuant to the Adam Walsh Child Protection Act, Americans and lawful US permanent residents who have received a conviction of any “specified offense against a minor” are prohibited from submitting a family-based immigrant petition on behalf of any type of beneficiary.

The Adam Walsh Act also bars U.S. citizens convicted of these aforementioned offenses from filing nonimmigrant visa petitions that would categorize their fiancées, spouses, or minor children as eligible for “K” nonimmigrant status (K1, K2, K3, K4). The different restrictions created by IMBRA and the Adam Walsh Act should not be taken lightly. While IMBRA mainly affects Applicants for K1 and K3 Visas, the Adam Walsh Act restricts filers of ALL family based visa petitions, including immigrant visa petitions.

There are certain offenses that have been deemed “specified offense[s] against a minor” that would cause the bar to become operative. The following is a non-exhaustive list of offenses that could cause a visa petition to be denied based upon the Adam Walsh Act: kidnapping or false imprisonment (unless committed by a parent), sexual solicitation, solicitation to engage in acts of prostitution, offenses involving child pornography, or anything that is determined to be an offense involving sexual conduct against a minor.

In cases where there is some doubt as to whether or not an offense would initiate a bar against the petitioner it may be prudent to seek the counsel of an experienced US Immigration Attorney in your jurisdiction. In situations where the offense is deemed to preclude a visa petition under the act, it may be possible to obtain a waiver of the decision. If the waiver application is denied, then the decision cannot be appealed. In order to obtain a waiver, the petitioner must prove that he or she not a threat to the prospective beneficiary.

This piece is meant for eductaional purposes and is not an adequate substitute for legal advice from an Immigration Lawyer. No attorney-client relationship exists between author and reader.)

For related information, please see US Tourist Visa

Preparing a Thai Fiance for the K1 Visa Interview at the US Embassy in Thailand

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

The climax of the US visa process is the K1 visa interview. This phase of the process may be the most anticipated, second only to the approval phase. In many ways, a US visa lawyer can be helpful in assisting a Thai with the fiancé visa interview.

Many Thai Fiancées approach an impending visa interview with a sense of foreboding and fear. Many are afraid that they will do or say something that will cause their visa to be denied. Some are confused about what they need to bring to the interview. There are instances in which applicants for a visa are worried about a possibly incriminating issue in their past and seek to avoid disclosure.

A few words of warning to applicant’s who are thinking about falsifying information for submission to the Embassy: Consular Officers are generally quite adept at discerning when an applicant is being deceitful and the consequences of attempting to defraud the United States government could be dire. If the Embassy finds that one is presenting false information in an attempt to obtain a visa then the entire application could be rejected and the applicant could be found inadmissible for entry into the USA. It is always a good decision to provide truthful answers to any of the consular officer’s questions.

For those simply nervous about the K1 visa interview itself, it may be reassuring to point out that the consular officers are not in the habit of using the visa interview as a method of brow beating a Thai fiancée. Instead, the visa interview is a means of conducting due diligence in an effort to determine whether a couple’s relationship is bona fide and the Thai fiancee is not legally inadmissible to the USA.

Often, K1 visas will be denied under 221 (g) of the Immigration and Nationality act. The word, “denial,” is somewhat misleading in the context of a 221 g in the sense that it is not so much a denial as it is a request for more information. When a 221 g request is presented to the Thai fiancée it usually means that the petition was deficient in some way, usually some document is missing. The consular officer will remit a form to the Thai fiancée that stipulates what is missing and what needs to be presented in order for the consular section to process the K1 visa.

Should a fiancée receive an outright denial because the consular officer made the decision that the relationship was not bona fide, then that decision is unlikely to be subject to an appeal. At the same time, if a consular officer determines that a prospective fiance visa beneficiary is legally inadmissible to the USA, then a waiver might be available depending upon the specific ground of inadmissibility at issue.

(Please note that the content contained herein is to be utilized for informational purposes only and should not be inferred as creating an attorney-client relationship between the author and any subsequent reader. One should always obtain legal advice from a competent licensed attorney.)

 

Packet 3 and the K1 Visa Interview

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

Of all of the publications dealing with US Visas from Thailand, the majority merely inform readers about submission of the visa application to USCIS, few deal with consular processing issues. This post is intended to inform prospective applicants about the K-1 Visa, and what measures ought to be taken by a Thai fiancee to navigate through the visa interview and hopefully obtain a favorable outcome in her case.

What is a Consular Processing Attorney and how can they help my Thai Fiancée?

A Consular Processing Attorney is a licensed Attorney in the US who maintains an office near a US Embassy abroad. While an Immigration Lawyer in the US has the ability to file a petition with USCIS it is unlikely that they will have an office in Thailand to help expedite the process. Also, an Attorney with an office in Thailand can better deal with the Thai Fiancée herself because an Attorney in Thailand will likely have Thai staff to help explain the process and what documentation needs to be obtained. Also, an Attorney on the ground may be able to interact with the US Embassy officials should an issue arise. Among the things an Immigration Attorney in Thailand can assist with: preparing your Thai Fiancée for the visa interview (by going over probable questions and explaining them in Thai), Preparing all documents to be filed with the consular services division (translations can be included as well), obtaining a Police Clearances for the Thai Fiancée, obtaining medical exams for your Thai Fiancée, and responding to 221(g) requests for more information (often the Embassy, in their discretion will require some other documentation).

As well as these advantages, merely having an Attorney on the scene to consult with can add a great deal to one’s peace of mind regarding the Immigration process particularly where the US Citizen is back in the US waiting for the Thai Fiancée to come to the US. In situations similar to this it can be a major boon to have competent counsel in Thailand in order to effectively handle the documentary requests from the Embassy, thus taking some of the workload off of the Thai fiancee. Where there is a difficulty communicating due to a lack of language proficiency the Immigration process can be made a great deal more difficult. However, by having an Attorney on hand the frustration and confusion can be reduced because the burden does not fall upon the Thai to deal with the Embassy. Instead, a legally trained expert can deal with the Embassy and explain to the Thai Fiancée exactly what needs to be done in order to expedite the process.

Packet 3 and your Thai Fiancee: how a Consular Processing Attorney Can Help

The package commonly referred to as “Packet 3,” is the information packet that the United States Embassy will mail to a Thai fiancee setting forth the necessary documents that must be retrieved before the interview for a K1 fiance visa. A Consular Processing Attorney will not only assist in obtaining the documentation, but can also provide guidance on what is required and tips to expedite the process. Some applicants worry a great deal about Packet 3, but by retaining competent counsel the process of submitting Packet 3 can proceed in an efficient and effective manner.

The information contained herein is meant for educational purposes only and is not intended to be utilized as a substitute for competent legal advice from an attorney in good standing in the United States. No Attorney/Client Relationship (either express or implied) shall be inferred from reading this publication, for more information please see fiance visa thailand.